What is a secondary source for World War 2?

What is a secondary source for World War 2?

Newspaper articles, weekly/monthly news magazines, diaries, correspondence, and diplomatic records from 19. Articles in scholarly journals analyzing the war, possibly footnoting primary documents; books analyzing the war.

What are two sources of secondary sources?

Typical secondary sources include:Scholarly Journal Articles. Use these and books exclusively for writing Literature Reviews.Magazines.Reports.Encyclopedias.Handbooks.Dictionaries.Documentaries.Newspapers.

What is a primary source for World War 2?

Primary sources on general military history, military campaigns and soldiers, the Holocaust, the Japanese American experience, the atomic bomb, Japanese war crimes, and photographs, posters, and newspapers.

How can you tell if a source is primary or secondary?

To determine if a source is primary or secondary, ask yourself:Was the source created by someone directly involved in the events you’re studying (primary), or by another researcher (secondary)?Does the source provide original information (primary), or does it summarize information from other sources (secondary)?

What is primary and secondary data with example?

Primary data is information collected through original or first-hand research. For example, surveys and focus group discussions. On the other hand, secondary data is information which has been collected in the past by someone else. For example, researching the internet, newspaper articles and company reports.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of secondary sources?

Advantages: Secondary sources provide a variety of expert perspectives and insights. Disadvantages: Because secondary sources are not necessarily focused on your specific topic, you may have to dig to find applicable information. Advantages: They offer a quick, easy introduction to your topic.

Why are secondary sources unreliable?

Disadvantages of Secondary Sources Their experiences and biases will color how the information is presented. Two different authors can interpret the same piece of original material in two wildly different ways. As such, secondary sources are unreliable as primary points of evidence.